Keyword summary
74%2 analyzed articles/videos808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology Policy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 4,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,208 of 34,784 keywords). This Technology Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Technology Policy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
74%Technology Policy (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos