Keyword summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Billionaires results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,254 hits . Analysis detected 8,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,430 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (27,907 of 34,377 keywords). This Tech Billionaires is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Tech Billionaires
Keyword details
Total words: 10,430
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst