Keyword summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tea Party results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 12,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,593 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,082 of 35,718 keywords). This Tea Party is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Tea Party
Keyword details
Total words: 9,593
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst