Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Refunds results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 1,490 hits . Analysis detected 8,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,120 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,231 of 37,533 keywords). This Tax Refunds is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Tax Refunds
Keyword details
Total words: 5,120
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.1% percentile 4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 29.1% 29.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst