Tax Day is here: Advice for last-minute filers racing against the clock 10%

By Eric Revell74%

4/15/2026, 5:48:59 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 777 faulty-reasoning hits from 582 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,711 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the article peer group.

The tax filing deadline for 2025 tax returns is here, with taxpayers having until just before midnight on April 15 to file their returns or request an extension. 
Last-minute tax filers racing against the clock to get their return filed ahead of the IRS deadline will want to be systematic in ensuring they have everything they need to file their return accurately when they get started, according to a tax expert. 
"Gather all your documents in one place," said Lisa Greene-Lewis, CPA and TurboTax expert, in an interview with FOX Business. 
"Documents that report your income like your W-2s, 1099s, and then don't forget about any forms or receipts for anything that can be deductible." 
She noted that the process of gathering those documents may be more extensive than in years past due to changes from last year's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which created new provisions extending tax relief to income from tips, overtime and Social Security. 
HOW TO FILE A TAX EXTENSION BEFORE THE APRIL 15 DEADLINE 
Other provisions affected the child tax credit and created a deduction for auto loan interest on some new U.S.-made cars, while businesses are able to depreciate equipment for the year purchased instead of amortizing it over several years. 
Taxpayers who anticipate getting a refund back from the IRS can get their refund the fastest by e-filing their return. 
"Go online and e-file with direct deposit  that's the fastest way to get your refund," Greene-Lewis recommended. 
"If you mail your return, you don't know when the IRS is going to get it. 
If you e-file, you get a message that they've accepted it." 
BEWARE OF THESE TAX SCAMS AS THE FILING DEADLINE APPROACHES, CONGRESS WARNS 
Greene-Lewis said that taxpayers who plan to mail their return should keep in mind that the U.S. 
Postal Service changed how it postmarks mail. 
Starting in late December, USPS changed its rules to postmark parcels when processed at a facility, rather than when they're dropped off at a post office, which can delay the postmark by 24 hours or more in some cases. 
That means taxpayers who want to mail their return should either mail early, use certified mail or request a "round-date stamp" be applied manually when dropping it off at the retail counter. 
IRS REFUND TRACKER EXPLAINED: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE THIS YEAR'S TAX FILING DEADLINE 
E-filing will allow taxpayers to have their returns processed more quickly, which means that any tax refund they are owed will hit their accounts via direct deposit sooner. 
"The majority of people do get a refund, and we are seeing that refunds will be up this year," Greene-Lewis said. 
"I would definitely try to make the deadline with all the deductions and credits available. 
Especially if you're thinking you might owe, you may be able to get a refund." 
Taxpayers can request an extension to file their 2025 tax return through the IRS website and third-party tax preparation services, though they should be aware that if they owe the IRS money they will need to pay that amount or set up a payment plan by the deadline. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
"One thing to remember is that it is an extension to file, and not an extension to pay. 
So you do need to try to pay what you owe by the deadline, even if you're filing an extension," Greene-Lewis added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias5.7%This article: 14.4%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect14.4%This article: 9.3%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion9.3%This article: 7.4%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.4%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias14.4%This article: 2.6%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 2.1%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.4%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority12.4%This article: 5.5%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.1%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization10.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.2%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.8%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading3.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.4%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 13.6%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination13.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

582 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker55%attributed speech264writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 24 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 17 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 39 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 18 words • 100.0% coverageLisa Greene-Lewis • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lisa Greene-Lewis

71%flagged-word coverage
318 attributed words100% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+24.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lisa Greene-Lewis: 24.8%24.8%Biased Writer Voice-16.3 ptsWriter: 16.3%Lisa Greene-Lewis: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+5.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lisa Greene-Lewis: 5.3%5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Lisa Greene-Lewis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.