Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,236 hits. Analysis detected 7,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,105 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,212 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,105
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos