Keyword summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Audit results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (25,339 of 37,536 keywords). This Tax Audit is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Tax Audit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠33%Tax Audit (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos