Keyword summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 1,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarcisio De Freitas results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 355 hits . Analysis detected 2,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,759 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,154 of 37,536 keywords). This Tarcisio De Freitas is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Tarcisio De Freitas
Keyword details
Total words: 3,759
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst