Keyword summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos1,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taliban results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,347 hits. Analysis detected 11,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,940 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (22,757 of 34,833 keywords). This Taliban is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Taliban
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠35%Taliban (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos