Keyword summary
49%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tag Democratic Party results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 1,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,412 of 37,536 keywords). This Tag Democratic Party is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Tag Democratic Party
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Tag Democratic Party (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,250
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos