Keyword summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Systemic Neglect results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,118 of 37,536 keywords). This Systemic Neglect is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Systemic Neglect
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠60%Systemic Neglect (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,933
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos