Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sushi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 4,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,413 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,161 of 34,832 keywords). This Sushi is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Sushi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Sushi (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,413
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate