Keyword summary
46%3 analyzed articles/videos2,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suppress Zephr results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,063 hits. Analysis detected 6,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,742 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,340 of 35,444 keywords). This Suppress Zephr is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Suppress Zephr
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
29%Suppress Zephr (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,742
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos