Keyword summary
94% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Budget results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 776 hits . Analysis detected 4,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,501 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (12,787 of 35,444 keywords). This Supplemental Budget is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Supplemental Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 3,501
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst