Keyword summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Substance Use results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,421 hits . Analysis detected 9,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,454 of 37,536 keywords). This Substance Use is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Substance Use
Keyword details
Total words: 13,300
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst