Keyword summary
25%2 analyzed articles/videos4,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Substance Use results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,421 hits. Analysis detected 9,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,454 of 37,536 keywords). This Substance Use is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Substance Use
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
17%Substance Use (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,300
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate