Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stormy Daniels results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 2,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Stormy Daniels is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stormy Daniels
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Stormy Daniels (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos