Keyword summary
70% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stalking Scandal results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,130 hits . Analysis detected 7,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,351 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,123 of 37,537 keywords). This Stalking Scandal is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Stalking Scandal
Keyword details
Total words: 9,351
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst