Keyword summary
30%4 analyzed articles/videos843 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stalking results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 3,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,800 of 37,536 keywords). This Stalking is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Stalking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Stalking (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate