Keyword summary
79% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staffing results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,437 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,474 of 37,533 keywords). This Staffing is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Staffing
Keyword details
Total words: 4,437
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst