Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These St Louis Bars results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 151 hits . Analysis detected 925 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Bars is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. St Louis Bars
Keyword details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst