Keyword summary
â 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Springfield Ohio results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,492 hits . Analysis detected 14,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,124 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of â 59% (15,384 of 36,687 keywords). This Springfield Ohio is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Springfield Ohio
Keyword details
Total words: 10,124
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst