Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spies results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,458 hits. Analysis detected 8,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,732 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,301 of 37,536 keywords). This Spies is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Spies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Spies (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,732
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.4%25.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.7%13.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate