Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Relationship results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 5,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,322 of 37,536 keywords). This Special Relationship is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Special Relationship
Keyword details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.8% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 24.1% 24.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst