Keyword summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Debris results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,341 hits . Analysis detected 10,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,767 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,296 of 37,536 keywords). This Space Debris is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Space Debris
Keyword details
Total words: 5,767
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst