Keyword summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Debris results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,341 hits. Analysis detected 10,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,767 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,296 of 37,536 keywords). This Space Debris is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Space Debris
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Space Debris (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,767
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 22.3%22.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate