Keyword summary
43%5 analyzed articles/videos3,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South And Central Asia results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,362 hits. Analysis detected 8,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,675 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,964 of 37,536 keywords). This South And Central Asia is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
South And Central Asia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
10%South And Central Asia (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate