Keyword summary
42% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sonoma County results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,448 hits . Analysis detected 10,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,590 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (30,644 of 36,902 keywords). This Sonoma County is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Sonoma County
Keyword details
Total words: 12,590
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst