Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 1,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Johnson results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 757 hits . Analysis detected 4,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,616 of 6,359 authors). This Julie Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Julie Johnson
Author details
Total words: 6,092
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst