Keyword summary
34%1 analyzed article/video1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Project results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 552 hits. Analysis detected 2,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (28,753 of 34,833 keywords). This Solar Project is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Solar Project
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
18%Solar Project (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos