Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soar Program results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 3,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,613 of 37,536 keywords). This Soar Program is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Soar Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Soar Program (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos