University lets students earn bachelor's and master's degrees entirely on their phone 76%

By Eric Revell74%

5/5/2026, 5:16:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 57% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 591 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.7% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,309 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the article peer group.

Americans looking to earn degrees at their own speed can now do so via their mobile phones after Cornerstone University tailored degree offerings in its business program to cater to students who prefer a self-paced program that can be completed on a smartphone. 
"We developed the nation's first mobile platform to deliver an accredited undergraduate degree and a master's degree as well, all via your mobile phone," Cornerstone University President Gerson Moreno-Riaño told FOX Business in an interview. 
Moreno-Riaño said that the program launched in August and has about 250 students enrolled. 
Students in what's known as the SOAR program can obtain an associate's or bachelor's degree in strategic business management, or a master's degree in organizational leadership. 
"One of the beautiful things we've seen is that the persistence rate from month-to-month is 91%, so students are sticking with this and completing it," he said, adding that some students who transferred in with prior credits to complete a degree will be the program's first graduates this year. 
ROWE WARNS OF MASSIVE WORKFORCE SHAKEUP, SAYS SANDERS IS RIGHT: 'REVOLUTION UNLIKE ANYTHING' WE'VE SEEN COMING 
Moreno-Riaño said that Cornerstone's price point for its SOAR bachelor's degree is $24,000 from start to finish, while the master's degree is $12,000. 
"More than half of our current students enrolled in the program now are paying no tuition due to scholarships and grants." 
"We see this as an opportunity to address a gap in our country now when it comes to education, and frankly, we're convinced that the current American higher ed infrastructure cannot address this challenge. 
It was built for what I call traditional brick and mortar students," he said. 
"We thought, how can we take this ubiquitous piece of technology that everybody has, that everyone spends a lot of time on? 
On average, in our country, we're talking about well over four hours a day that adults are on their mobile devices." 
FEDERAL COURT TERMINATES BIDEN-ERA STUDENT LOAN PLAN AFFECTING MILLIONS NATIONWIDE 
Moreno-Riaño said Cornerstone tested the app for over a year with about 120 students, which informed the university's process of revising and launching the SOAR app. 
He said that Cornerstone is deeply concerned with how it reaches out to non-traditional students and disenchanted students, some of whom haven't tried to pursue a degree while others tried a traditional college experience and aren't willing to return. 
Moreno-Riaño said that when Cornerstone was mapping out the program, it understood that the traditional curriculum of 120 credit hours in a degree program couldn't be mapped over to a mobile app, so the school sought to unpackage those courses into "bite-sized chunks of educational content." 
RECENT COLLEGE GRADS ARE LOSING THEIR EDGE IN THE JOB MARKET, STUDY SHOWS 
"In the app, there will be mini-lectures, podcasts, book reviews, interviews, all with very closely, carefully designed learning objectives throughout the program," Moreno-Riaño said, explaining that some of the lectures may be in the range of 5 to 10 minutes. 
"We have micro assessments built-in that are immediately graded and feedback is given to the student." 
Some of the program's first graduates told Moreno-Riaño that they listen to some of the lessons while commuting to work, while traveling or doing household chores. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
"It allows them to, in essence, continue the learning experience amidst a complex schedule because we unbundle it, unpackage it, redevelop it and maintain the engagement criteria so that students stay studying and focused," he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.6%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias20.6%This article: 5.9%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias5.9%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 29.4%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias29.4%This article: 5.8%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias5.8%This article: 6.6%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias6.6%This article: 18.3%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.8%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority22.8%This article: 5.8%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.1%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.1%This article: 8.3%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization8.3%This article: 6.6%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring6.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.7%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion11.7%This article: 3.7%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question3.7%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.2%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal16.2%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 29.6%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)29.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote8.0%This article: 5.9%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.9%This article: 23.0%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice23.0%This article: 12.4%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination12.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 57.0%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…57.0%

591 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker78%attributed speech129writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 35 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 23 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 21 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 34 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 26 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 39 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 40 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 16 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageGerson Moreno-Riaño • 36 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gerson Moreno-Riaño

97%flagged-word coverage
462 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -16.3 ptsWriter: 69.8%Gerson Moreno-Riaño: 53.5%53.5%Biased Writer Voice-21.1 ptsWriter: 39.5%Gerson Moreno-Riaño: 18.4%18.4%Indoctrination+15.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gerson Moreno-Riaño: 15.8%15.8%Unattributed Quote+10.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gerson Moreno-Riaño: 10.2%10.2%Quote-first Misdirection+7.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gerson Moreno-Riaño: 7.6%7.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.