Keyword summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cornerstone University results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and False Dilemma , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 724 hits . Analysis detected 6,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,742 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,107 of 37,536 keywords). This Cornerstone University is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Cornerstone University
Keyword details
Total words: 5,742
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst