Keyword summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos3,490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Silverstone results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 964 hits. Analysis detected 8,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,308 of 36,962 keywords). This Silverstone is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Silverstone
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
8%Silverstone (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate