Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shaw Neighborhood results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 155 hits . Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,445 keywords). This Shaw Neighborhood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Shaw Neighborhood
Keyword details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst