Keyword summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shasta Trinity National Forest results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (22,126 of 37,536 keywords). This Shasta Trinity National Forest is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Shasta Trinity National Forest
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos