Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shangri La Dialogue results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 5,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,468 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,414 of 37,530 keywords). This Shangri La Dialogue is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Shangri La Dialogue
Keyword details
Total words: 5,468
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst