Keyword summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sex Trafficking Charges results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 670 hits. Analysis detected 3,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,575 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,022 of 35,790 keywords). This Sex Trafficking Charges is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Sex Trafficking Charges
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
47%Sex Trafficking Charges (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,575
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate