Keyword summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Primary results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,418 hits . Analysis detected 11,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,277 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,013 of 35,697 keywords). This Senate Primary is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Senate Primary
Keyword details
Total words: 9,277
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst