Keyword summary
84% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Democrats results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,955 hits . Analysis detected 15,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,393 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,207 of 37,533 keywords). This Senate Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Senate Democrats
Keyword details
Total words: 12,393
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst