Keyword summary
90%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Campaign results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,250 hits. Analysis detected 5,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (7,856 of 35,444 keywords). This Senate Campaign is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Senate Campaign
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
78%Senate Campaign (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 37.4%37.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos