Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Semaglutide results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 797 hits. Analysis detected 4,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,919 of 37,533 keywords). This Semaglutide is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Semaglutide
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%Semaglutide (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,216
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos