Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Secretary Of State results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 812 hits. Analysis detected 9,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,368 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,039 of 34,326 keywords). This Secretary Of State is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Secretary Of State
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Secretary Of State (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,368
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos