Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Second Continental Congress results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 2,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (14,855 of 37,536 keywords). This Second Continental Congress is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Second Continental Congress
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos