Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Police results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,593 hits . Analysis detected 10,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,595 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,386 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Police is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Seattle Police
Keyword details
Total words: 6,595
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.6% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst