Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Mariners results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 3,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,832 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Mariners is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Seattle Mariners
Keyword details
Total words: 3,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst