Keyword summary
14%3 analyzed articles/videos2,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screening results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 4,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,380 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,271 of 37,530 keywords). This Screening is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Screening
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
12%Screening (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,380
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos