Keyword summary
29% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scammers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 803 hits . Analysis detected 6,843 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,334 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,478 of 37,536 keywords). This Scammers is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Scammers
Keyword details
Total words: 7,334
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst