Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Russell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 6,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Sarah Russell is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Sarah Russell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Sarah Russell (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,175
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos