Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Russell results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 6,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Sarah Russell is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Sarah Russell
Keyword details
Total words: 6,175
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst