Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Gabriel Valley results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,056 hits . Analysis detected 15,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,624 of 37,536 keywords). This San Gabriel Valley is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. San Gabriel Valley
Keyword details
Total words: 17,612
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst