Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cierra Morgan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,707 hits . Analysis detected 14,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,627 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,521 of 6,316 authors). This Cierra Morgan is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Cierra Morgan
Author details
Total words: 11,627
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst