Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nik Venet results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 3,053 hits . Analysis detected 18,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,070 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,763 of 6,628 authors). This Nik Venet is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Nik Venet
Author details
Total words: 16,070
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst